|
Home
Meetings, Public Events
Negotiations Information and Company
Proposal
S.L.C. and Pension Information
News and Newsletters
Rally Pictures (Parliament Hill)
Information for Members on Layoff and
Action Centre Website link
Donations from Businesses and Organizations
Picket Line Information for
Members and Captains
Local 8782 Collective
Agreement
Group Benefits
Health and Safety
Feedback
Contacts
Executive and Committees
Links
District 6 Savings Plan
Retirees
Womens Committee
Scholarships
Ways and Means Committee
Heckett's Multiserv
| |
This page will display current news inside
and outside the plant.

Some of the newsletters are large files and can
take some time to open depending on your internet speed. Please allow
enough time for them to open. Any other problems please email vp@uswa8782.com.
Thanks
To Read the
Weekly Newsletter Dated March 3, 2010 Click Here
To Read the
Weekly Newsletter Dated March 10, 2010 Click Here

Lake Erie
workers to rally one year after Nanticoke layoffs
TheSpec.com
- Business - Lake Erie workers to rally one year after Nanticoke layoffs
The Hamilton
Spectator
(Mar 13,
2010)
Lake Erie steelworkers will mark a sad anniversary tomorrow -- one year since
the start of a round of layoffs at the plant that eventually idled 800 workers.
That layoff, at what was once considered the most productive steel plant in
North America, was followed in August by the lockout of the remaining 200
workers over a contract dispute.
To mark the anniversary, United Steelworkers Local 8782 is planning a rally
at the front gate of the plant, starting at 1 p.m. Local politicians and labour
leaders have been invited to show support.
More concrete support has already been shown by Local 1005 workers in
Hamilton, who raised more than $10,000 in a plant gate collection for the Lake
Erie staff.
The union is using the shutdown of the plant as a lesson in the dangers of
foreign takeovers of Canadian industry -- the former Stelco was taken over by
U.S. Steel in 2007. The federal government is also showing concern over that
issue, launching a lawsuit against U.S. Steel alleging the shutdown violates
production and employment promises the company made in the original purchase
agreement.
Local 8782 has standing in that case and is using it as a platform to lobby
provincial and federal governments on issues such as employment insurance,
employment standards and training.
|
Haldimand County : Layoffs
and Lock Out at US Steel Has Big Domino Effect |
| Posted by
Jen Waumsley
|
| Tomorrow, laid-off and locked-out U.S. Steel workers will
gather at the information picket line to mark a somber anniversary. It's
been one year since the layoffs started in Nanticoke, but the job losses are
hitting more than just the families of those employees. In today's final
part of our U.S. Steel series we look at the overall impact this labour
dispute has had on our county.
For decades the steel plant has been one of the biggest employers in
Haldimand Norfolk, but that's changed drastically over the past few years.
Norfolk Mayor Dennis Travale says this labour dispute could not have hit at
a worse time - coupled with a world-wide recession the scope is magnified
many times over. In an area where industrial jobs are limited and plants are
closing, and the local agricultural sector relies heavily on imported labour,
the options for a laid-off or locked-out worker are highly restricted.
Travale says while re-training programs offer some hope for laid-off
workers, it's not even an option for those locked-out, and from what he's
been told most would prefer to just get back inside the plant to the jobs
they've held for years.
Studies and surveys conducted by local groups have determined that for every
job lost at the Lake Erie plant, there have been at least seven other
spin-off jobs lost. The snowball affect that has had on our community and
local economy has been devastating. Add to that the fact that demand for
local essential services is up, and donations are down. For example the
United Way of Haldimand Norfolk has seen major shortfalls in fundraising
goals over the past couple of years - mainly because Stelco/US Steel had
been one their biggest community partners. And because hundreds have lost
their jobs the agencies the United Way fund - like the Salvation Army,
Canadian Mental Health Association, and Haldimand Norfolk REACH - have
growing waiting lists for locals in need of help.
Further from Mayor Dennis Travale;
“As we unfortunately and sadly approach the anniversary of the “temporary”
shut-down of operations at the U.S. Steel, Lake Erie plant, we all grieve
the impact this action has had on the workers, their families, and our
community. The impact on our community has been dramatic, and when coupled
with a world-wide recession the scope is magnified many times over.
In my meetings with senior Canadian U. S. Steel company officials following
their announcement, it was revealed that for every job at the U. S. Steel,
Lake Erie plant, there were at least seven other related and supportive
jobs.
In an area where industrial jobs are limited and plants are closing because
manufacturing across Ontario is in rapid decline, and the local agricultural
sector relies heavily on imported labour, the options for a laid-off or
locked-out worker are highly restricted. Re-training is a program that
offers hope, but I dare to surmise that most workers would prefer to just
get back inside the plant to their jobs.
While the community tries to strengthen the existing local safety net, in
all of its aspects, and we provide both active and emotional support, there
is little we can do to bring resolve to the issue. The answers can not be
found in Norfolk or Haldimand.
We are ever thankful for the multi-millions of dollars invested in the
infrastructure of Norfolk from both the federal and provincial governments,
and these dollars do and will provide employment options; however, changes
to the Labour laws are vitally important and I wrote to both the Premier and
the Prime Minister on this issue.
The workers, our friends, our neighbours, our husbands, wives, sons,
daughters, our family members, deserve our support and will get our support
to the full extent of our ability.
I will be attending the “rally” on Sunday to demonstrate my personal and
Council’s continued support of the workers."
| US
Steel - The Legal Side... |
| Posted by
Adam Liefl
|
When it comes to the situation at U.S. Steel and the tension between
the American owned company and the Canadian Union, a lot will depend
on decisions yet to be made by the court. The steel maker is being
sued by Ottawa for breaking job and production promises it made under
the act when it acquired Stelco more than two years ago. U.S. Steel is
arguing that a case against it should be thrown out due to the legal
flaws in the Investment Canada Act. The steel maker agrees that it has
not made good on production and employment promises made at the time
of the sale, but says it had no choice because of the "sudden
international economic crisis." Justice Dolores Hansen has yet to
decide whether the act is indeed unconstitutional and the case against
U.S. Steel should be thrown out. If she decides the case should go
ahead, the Federal Court will then hear arguments from both sides as
to whether U.S. Steel was justified in failing to meet its promises.
If not, the decision will be as to a punishment. That could include
fines and a forced sale to another interested company. In September
2009, Welland based Lakeside Steel had come forward saying they wanted
buy the Lake Erie and Hamilton Works operations. They were even given
intervenor status. We'll to wait and see what Justice Hanson's
decision is.
|
|

Rally
marks one year of layoffs
Steelworkers say they expect a "massive" turnout to a rally they have
planned for Sunday afternoon at the front gate of the idled U.S. Steel
mill in Nanticoke.
A Hamilton musician will play from a stage while politicians from the
municipal, provincial, and federal levels -- as well as all three major
parties -- are expected to attend.
The event is being held to mark the one-year anniversary of the first
round of layoffs at the plant.
About 1,100 employees are out of work, and there is no sign of when the
plant will re-open.
The union wants to bring public attention to their plight as they
continue to lobby the provincial and federal governments to intervene on
their behalf.
Paul Mason, political action chair of the United Steelworkers Local
8782, said the event will attract people from as far away as Hamilton and
Toronto in addition to local residents.
"We're stressing the community needs to be involved in this," Mason
said. "The financial impact of 1,100 workers being out of work has
impacted the whole community. These are well-paying jobs."
The first layoffs on March 14, 2009, sent 480 people to the
unemployment lines. Waves of layoffs followed while the company locked out
the last 200 workers in August.
The union has accused the company of engaging in U.S. protectionism --
shutting Nanticoke while handing its orders to the company's American
operations -- and said the plant's idling raises issues about foreign
ownership rules.
The Conservative government in Ottawa has taken the company to court
over the issue.
"The best way to solve the situation is to get all three parties on
board," said Mason.
"The bottom line is that this is going to draw attention from the
highest levels of government."
Mason said U.S. Steel has "broken its own promises" about maintaining
production and employment levels at the plant made to the federal
government when it bought the former Canadian- owned Stelco in 2007.
Union president Bill Ferguson said that working in the plant hasn't
been the same since the change in ownership.
"It's such an oppressive atmosphere," Ferguson said. "It went from
being one of the best places to work to one of the worst places to work
after U.S. Steel took over. A lot of people don't want to work there."
Mason said some of the plant's "young tradesmen" have already taken
other jobs and don't intend to return.
Sunday's rally, he said, is "shaping up to be a well-attended event."
He wouldn't estimate the numbers expected but added "I'm expecting a
massive turnout."
A rally to mark the one-year anniversary of the idling of the steel
mill at Nanticoke will be held at the plant's front gates on Sunday, March
14, 1 p.m.-3 p.m.
Daniel Pearce
519-426-3528 ext. 132 dpearce@bowesnet.com |
Steelworkers respond to Throne Speech
Throne Speech goes in opposite direction from protecting Canadian
communities: Steelworkers
TORONTO - “Protecting Canadian communities should be the first order of business
of our federal government. However, in the Throne Speech, Mr. Harper has
indicated he is going to further abdicate his responsibility to ensure
communities are the net beneficiaries of foreign ownership,” says Ken Neumann,
United Steelworkers national director for Canada.
The federal government’s Throne Speech has emphasized that the government
intends on opening the door to foreign investment: “Our government will open
Canada’s doors further to venture capital and to foreign investment in key
sectors.”
“It is outrageous that this government has refused to side with Canadian
communities and workers as foreign multinational after foreign multinational buy
up Canadian companies and end up devastating our resource communities. Today’s
statement rather than indicating the government will come to the aid of our
communities by putting more teeth in the Investment Canada Act, will actually
add insult to the injury communities like Sudbury and Hamilton are
experiencing,” Neumann says.
Foreign takeovers by companies like Vale Inco, Xstrata and U.S. Steel have
failed to be a “net benefit” to Canada as the law requires.
Rather, these takeovers have resulted in thousands of lost jobs, the closing
of vital plants and mills, and the transferring of industrial production outside
our borders.
Yet, Harper’s government has failed to make those companies live up to their
lawful requirements, and have even refused to make public the promises made by
these companies.
“This is a tragic failure of our federal government at a time when many
Canadian workers are looking for leadership in protecting their jobs and their
communities,” Neumann emphasized.
U.S. Steel to
pay $187,500
TheSpec.com
- Local - U.S. Steel to pay $187,500
Pleads guilty
to '08 discharge of soot over North End
Eric McGuinness
The Hamilton
Spectator
(Mar 3,
2010)
U.S. Steel Canada will pay a penalty of $187,500 for discharging a plume of
black soot that spread over Hamilton's North End as people were enjoying
bayfront parks and the Waterfront Trail on a warm summer evening two years ago.
The company pleaded guilty yesterday to one violation of Ontario's
Environmental Protection Act for the release from its Hamilton Works blast
furnace on July 11, 2008.
Similar events occurred on July 31, Aug. 7 and Aug. 19, all blamed on the
furnace bleeder valve opening to prevent a potentially dangerous pressure
buildup inside.
Ministry investigators reported sooty, black deposits on cars, boats, homes,
patio furniture, gardens and clothing.
Some people reported difficulty breathing.
One resident told The Spectator it looked like black dust bunnies falling
from the sky.
Frances Jewell, past commodore of the Hamilton Bay Sailing Club, said members
were eating vanilla ice cream after a barbecue and suddenly found themselves and
their ice cream covered in soot.
U.S. Steel Canada, which bought the former Stelco in 2007, has six weeks to
pay a fine of $150,000 and a victim surcharge of $37,500.
emcguinness@thespec.com
Laid off Steelworkers plan massive rally to mark
anniversary
Posted By SIMCOE REFORMER
March 1, 2010
U.S. STEEL:Workers preparing for one-year anniversary of
mill closing
DANIEL PEARCE
Laid off steelworkers from Nanticoke are planning a massive rally at the
front gate of their plant to mark the first anniversary of the closing of the
mill.
The event will be held Sunday, March 14, from 1-3 p.m., and all members of
the public are invited.
More than 800 people lost their jobs at the U.S. Steel plant in a series of
layoffs that began last March. The remaining 200 workers were locked out in
August.
Bill Ferguson, president of the United Steelworkers Local 8782, said his
members remain hopeful they will be able to return to work.
"I believe we will get through this and will get that plant opened again,"
Ferguson said last week in a brief address to the Port Dover Board of Trade's
annual meeting.
Standing a few feet away from local MP Diane Finley, who is also Canada's
minister of human resources and skills development, and her husband Senator Doug
Finley, Ferguson thanked the community for "its support during these troubled
times."
Public support across both Norfolk and Haldimand counties "has been
fantastic," he said.
Ferguson also thanked Diane Finley for her help in fighting the mill's
closure, saying she has been "wonderful for us."
The Nanticoke plant -- said to be one of the most modern and efficient in the
world -- was closed by its American owner, U.S. Steel, after the recession hit
the industry hard in 2008 and 2009.
US Steel May Consider 'Acquisition
Opportunities'
March 1, 2010
Steel Business Briefing
US Steel says it will continue to "assess North American and international
expansion and divestment opportunities" in 2010, according to a recent filing
with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
"We may consider 100% acquisition opportunities, joint ventures and other
arrangements," the company said in the filing, seen by Steel Business Briefing.
The Pittsburgh-based steelmaker also said in the document that flatrolled
results for the current quarter "are expected to improve from fourth quarter
2009." It did not say by how much, however.
"Average realized prices are expected to increase from fourth quarter 2009,
as we expect to begin realizing the impact of increasing spot market prices
later in the first quarter," the company said. "We are currently making steel at
six of our seven North American steelmaking locations, with the exception being
our Lake Erie Works, which represents approximately 10% of our annual flatrolled
raw steel capability.
"We expect to complete maintenance work on our largest blast furnace, the No
14 blast furnace at Gary Works, late in the first quarter and have all available
capacity in operation at these six locations before the end of the quarter."
USS added that overall Q1 raw steel capability utilization rates are expected
to increase from Q4, as well.
Ontario’s
economy kicking into gear
TheSpec.com
- BreakingNews - Ontario’s economy kicking into gear
Conference
board says province’s economic growth will be second to B.C. this year
TORONTO —
The Conference Board of Canada says Ontario’s economy is starting to fire on all
cylinders.
Ontario is expected to be the second strongest economy in the country this
year, after British Columbia, and to outpace the national average for the first
time in a decade. Growth in Ontario is projected at 3.5 per cent this year.
The board’s Sabrina Browarski says the credit for the turnaround will go to the
automotive sector.
She says the sector should have double-digit growth.
Browarski says Ontario is projected to see about 74,000 new jobs created in
2010.
Premiers plead case in U.S.
February 20, 2010-TheStar.com
Robert Benzie
WASHINGTON–Premier Dalton McGuinty and other provincial leaders have taken
their case for fairer and more open trade with the U.S. to the White House.
McGuinty and six other premiers met for 80 minutes late Friday with U.S.
President Barack Obama's top adviser on the economy, Lawrence Summers, chair of
the National Economic Council.
In the imposing surroundings of the Roosevelt Room in the West Wing, the
premiers urged Summers to resist protectionist trade policies that would
undermine the economies of both countries.
"I got the sense from his conversation that there's an appreciation that
we're next door and we're already doing well, why would we not find ways to
continue to exploit that," said McGuinty.
"I like to think that under this administration there's a greater level of
receptivity to Canadian concerns," the premier said.
"The question that I put to Mr. Summers is, `President Obama's put forward an
ambitious target to double U.S. exports during the course of the next five
years. ... Where does Canada factor into that and is there a specific strategy
in place to achieve that target?'" he said.
"His answer was that the target at this point is more aspirational, there's
no specific strategy (yet)."
With the recent storm over "Buy American" provisions in the U.S. economic
stimulus package that shut out Canadian companies until Obama and Prime Minister
Stephen Harper forged a deal to allow greater access, the premiers worry about
further trade protectionism.
The controversial accord between Ottawa and Washington gets Canadian firms
around some U.S. barriers. In exchange, American companies can bid on provincial
and municipal projects in Canada.
Still, premiers fear protectionism will surface elsewhere.
To that end, McGuinty and the other members of the Council of the Federation
are hopeful that Saturday's historic joint session with the powerful National
Governors' Association of state leaders will pay dividends for Canadian
interests.
"I'm very pleased with the access we've been given here. It's an opportunity
to get our message out. It opens up doors," McGuinty said.
Saskatchewan's Brad Wall, chair of the premiers' council, said the summit is
"an opportunity to tell Canada's story and for us to make the case for fair and
free trade."
The premiers also met for 45 minutes with Lisa Jackson, head of the
Environmental Protection Agency.
Wall, as leader of an energy-producing province, called an EPA ruling last
year a cause for "concern" because it said greenhouse gas emissions are a matter
of public welfare, which means the agency can regulate them.
"Obviously, they're heading down this road. In both meetings (with Summers
and Jackson) there was a reference to the fact the U.S. can't act unilaterally,
that this should be the product of international agreement," he said.
"So that was heartening," said Wall, who worries environmental regulations
could be used as trade sanctions by stealth.
But Wall made the point that the Obama administration is also concerned about
energy security and with plentiful oil reserves right next door, that's good
news for Canada.
McGuinty is flying back late Saturday after a day of meetings with the
governors. But on Sunday, the other premiers will meet with Secretary of
Agriculture Tom Vilsack.
On the agenda is the controversial U.S. country-of-origin food labelling that
has hurt Canada's farmers.
Steel Shipments Rise in Canada, Aluminum in U.S.
American Machinist Staff
02/16/2010
The Metals Service Center Institute’s first report for 2010 found steel
shipments from U.S. metals centers totaled 2.58 million tons, or 0.9% below
January 2009 levels. As the latest month closed, U.S. centers held inventories
of about 6.26 million tons, 26.2% less than the January 2009 inventory total.
That is equal to a 2.4-month supply of steel in stock at current shipping
rates.
Centers in Canada shipped 440,000 tons in January, an impressive 9.2% above
January 2009 steel shipments. Canadian inventories at the end of January
totaled 1.18 million tons, a 2.7-month supply.
U.S. Steel
workers contribute cash to pension fight
TheSpec.com
- Local - U.S. Steel workers contribute cash to pension fight
Steve Arnold
The Hamilton
Spectator
(Feb 18,
2010)
Hamilton steelworkers dug deep yesterday, raising more than $7,000 to help
fellow steelworkers fight to protect their pension plan.
It's a battle the Hamilton workers know they'll be facing by the end of the
summer.
Yesterday's special collection at the gates of U.S. Steel's Hamilton plant
was to help 1,000 workers at the company's Lake Erie Works in Nanticoke. They've
been locked out since August after refusing a demand to turn their defined
benefit (DB) pension plan into a defined contribution (DC) model.
DB plans guarantee retirees a certain amount, usually based on length of
service. DC plans, like a registered retirement savings plan, pay a pension
based on how much has been contributed.
"Pension is the issue here," said Bill Ferguson, president of the United
Steel Workers local at Nanticoke. "The average Canadian worker should be scared
to death by the way this is happening."
U.S. Steel declined to comment about the situation.
The nation-wide fight over retirement plans has intensified in recent years.
The stock market crash of 2008 slashed the value of most pension plans, but
with DB plans, employers are required to make up the difference between the
value of what's in their fund and what it would need to pay promised pensions if
the company were to go out of business.
That can be a tremendous cost -- when the former Stelco went into bankruptcy
protection in 2004, it was facing a pension deficit of $1.4 billion and said the
cost of covering that shortfall in the required five years would cripple it.
Stelco eventually won an agreement from the provincial government to spread
repayments over a longer term as well as a $150-million injection of public
money.
Since its purchase by U.S. Steel, the situation hasn't improved sharply --
market turmoil in 2008 slashed about $300 million from the value of the fund
that supports 9,000 Hamilton retirees.
Based on that valuation, the plan has less than 58 per cent of what it would
need to cover the pensions workers were promised. An updated valuation is to be
completed this year.
Rolf Gerstenberger, president of the Hamilton steelworkers local, said the
major weakness of DC pension plans is that they put all of the risk on workers
-- if they happen to retire when the stock market and interest rates are down,
their pension income is cut.
"Whatever happens, under those plans it's the employee who takes the hit," he
said.
"When the market crashes, that can mean quite a bit less on your pension."
The problem is especially sharp for the Hamilton local, where 850 active
workers are responsible for creating enough value to support 9,000 retirees and
pay U.S. Steel the profits and returns it wants from the Canadian operations.
Despite those issues, Gerstenberger said workers should get what they were
promised when they committed their working lives to the company.
"We didn't do anything wrong, we went to work every day and made steel," he
said. "We know this is going to be an issue in our negotiations, but we've been
consistent in saying we didn't cause this problem."
When an employer goes out of business with an underfunded pension plan,
pensioners face having their retirement income slashed to cover the shortfall.
That's the issue faced by about 100 retirees from CHCH TV, who've been told
their pension plan is about 23 per cent short. Several thousand employees of
Nortel Networks Corp. barely escaped that fate earlier this month. Their plan is
about 30 per cent underfunded, but their pensions won't fall below $1,000 a
month after the provincial government agreed last week to put enough money into
a special insurance fund to cover that amount.
The federal and provincial governments are struggling to find a longer-term
solution. In December, Queen's Park announced the start of a two-stage process
it said will clarify benefits for people who are affected by layoffs, eliminate
partial pension windups after 2011 and make it easier for plans to restructure
when companies do.
In October, before Parliament was suspended, Ottawa proposed reforms that
require companies that wrap up their pension plans to pay all the benefits owed
to their workers. Firms will also be banned from taking a holiday from
contributions unless the plan has a 5 per cent funding cushion.
The federal reforms, however, didn't provide any protection for pensioners if
a company declares bankruptcy. That's part of a private member's bill tabled by
Hamilton MP Wayne Marston, of the NDP, that is still before Parliament despite
prorogation.
Other proposals have called for an expansion of the Canadian Pension Plan and
changes to the rules governing RRSPs to increase what people can contribute.
"We see a real need over time for a shift from employer plans and RRSPs to a
broader public plan," said Andrew Jackson, economic and social policy director
of the Canadian Labour Congress.
sarnold@thespec.com
Local steelworkers take collection for Nanticoke
TheSpec.com
- Business - Local steelworkers take collection for Nanticoke
The Hamilton
Spectator
(Feb 16,
2010)
Hamilton steelworkers will be asked to put their money where their hearts are
tomorrow morning in a special plant-gate collection for locked-out friends in
Nanticoke.
The special collection at the gates of the U.S. Steel Canada plant in
Hamilton will raise money to help workers locked out of their jobs at the
company's Lake Erie Works since Aug. 3, 2009.
Rolf Gerstenberger, president of United Steelworkers Local 1005, said the
collection is intended to show support for the Nanticoke workers. They were
locked out when their collective agreement expired and they rejected a package
of concessions.
Gerstenberger noted his members could face the same situation this year when
their own contract expires.
"In a few more months we're going to be in the thick of it as well," he said.
"The company wanted wage, benefit and pension concessions and they really
haven't been talking since."
Starting at 5:30 a.m. workers reporting to the Gage Avenue and Wilcox Street
gates of the Hamilton plant will be asked to dig deep by a crew of 35
canvassers.
"This is about solidarity and money, but the more money you collect, the more
solidarity you show," Gerstenberger said.
Local
steelworkers take collection for Nanticoke
TheSpec.com
- Business - Local steelworkers take collection for Nanticoke
The Hamilton
Spectator
(Feb 16,
2010)
Hamilton steelworkers will be asked to put their money where their hearts are
tomorrow morning in a special plant-gate collection for locked-out friends in
Nanticoke.
The special collection at the gates of the U.S. Steel Canada plant in
Hamilton will raise money to help workers locked out of their jobs at the
company's Lake Erie Works since Aug. 3, 2009.
Rolf Gerstenberger, president of United Steelworkers Local 1005, said the
collection is intended to show support for the Nanticoke workers. They were
locked out when their collective agreement expired and they rejected a package
of concessions.
Gerstenberger noted his members could face the same situation this year when
their own contract expires.
"In a few more months we're going to be in the thick of it as well," he said.
"The company wanted wage, benefit and pension concessions and they really
haven't been talking since."
Starting at 5:30 a.m. workers reporting to the Gage Avenue and Wilcox Street
gates of the Hamilton plant will be asked to dig deep by a crew of 35
canvassers.
"This is about solidarity and money, but the more money you collect, the more
solidarity you show," Gerstenberger said.
Canada Steelmakers Hurt By Buy America Program
Commodity Online - February 16, 2010
MASSACHUSSETS, USA (Commodity Online): The Canadian steel mills are facing a
crisis as it is unable to tap the US market and crude steel output has fallen
51% on a year-on-year basis to 5.54 mn tonnes.
The US market is now difficult for Canadian steel makers to penetrate as
infrastructural projects utilize US steel under the Buy America program,
according to Business Monitor International's latest Canada Metals Report.
The main consumer of Canadian steel notably domestic and US construction and
automotive industries, witnessed steep declines in orders and high inventories,
the BMI report said.
In August, output fell 52% y-o-y and 12.5% month-on-month (m-o-m) to 700,000
tonnes, indicating that the industry had yet to begin its recovery. In 2008,
Canadian steel production fell 3.8% y-o-y to 15.13mn tonnes, with the decline
largely the result of the aftermath of the international financial crisis that
began in September. By Q309, the industry, along with the rest of the
manufacturing sector, was suffering from idle or shuttered plants due to the
global economic downturn.
Steel plant capacity utilization had fallen below 50%. According to the Metals
Service Center Institute, shipments of steel and aluminum from metals service
centers in Canada in August 2009 rose slightly from weak July levels, but
destocking continued. Steel inventory to sales ratios fell as depleted
quantities of the metal reduced stocks to nearly a two month supply. Metals
service center shipped 415,500 tons of steel, down 18.8% y-o-y but up 4.3%
m-o-m.
Shipments for the first eight months of the year, of about 3.3mn tons, were down
by 32.1% y-o-y. Canadian metals output will be helped by increased investment in
infrastructure in H209 and 2010 as a result of the government's stimulus plans.
Provincial budgets are allocating massive amounts to infrastructure, sometimes
on a shared-cost basis with the federal government.
The government's CAD40bn fiscal plan will have a bit of an impact on economic
activity, but not nearly as much as that of the US, which is nearly US$800bn. If
Canada can secure some form of exemption from the 'Buy America' clause in the US
fiscal stimulus package, the domestic steel industry could share in the
resulting increase in demand in the US. Given the protracted nature of the
recession in North America and the impact of Buy America on Canada's steel
industry and economy as a while, BMI has revised down the crude steel output
forecast for 2010 from 15.0% to 8.7%. However, output growth is likely to reach
21.4% in 2011. There are a number of medium- and long-term challenges facing
Canadian metals producers. A rapid expansion in global steel production
capacity, particularly in China, is a chief concern for the Canadian industry
(Courtesy: PRLog)
Germany
steelmaker ThyssenKrupp says 1st quarter profit dipped 2 per cent
TheSpec.com
- Business - Germany steelmaker ThyssenKrupp says 1st quarter profit dipped 2
per cent
THE ASSOCIATED
PRESS-February 12, 2010
FRANKFURT, Germany - German steelmaker ThyssenKrupp AG said Friday that its
first quarter net profit dipped 2.4 per cent from last year, as a drop in
revenue offset its costs cuts.
The company, based in Duesseldorf, earned C164 million (nearly US $225
million) in the September-December period compared with C168 million a year
earlier.
Despite the drop, the figure beat analysts' estimates and it was the first
time that the company was in the black since the end of December 2008, having
faced restructuring charges and the effects of the global economic downturn on
the steel industry.
Revenue fell 19 per cent to nearly C9.4 billion compared with C11.5 billion
in the final three months of 2008.

Steelworkers Protest US Steel’s ‘Wholesale Indifference’
By Jane Slaughter
Created Feb 11 2010 - 11:40am
Ask a union member what’s the bedrock of a union contract, and most will
answer “seniority.” Long established as the way to keep the manager’s
brother-in-law from getting the good jobs, companies have learned to live with
taking turns and following recall lists.
But not U.S. Steel. At its Great Lakes Works south of Detroit, the company
came off a nine-month shutdown last summer picking and choosing who it wanted
to work in the mill. Some workers with more than 35 years’ seniority are still
on the street while some with less than three years are inside. Asked what
reason management gave for not calling her back, 31-year member Doriscine
Wesley said, “Low seniority.”
Rank and filers called for action, resulting in a 200-person picket line
outside company HQ Wednesday. A Steelworkers
Local 1299 leaflet decried
management’s “wholesale indifference” to parts of the contract:
 | An employment security clause signed in 2008 is supposed to guarantee a
job to those with at least three years’ seniority. |
 | A “manning level” clause is supposed to cut contractors in favor of USW
electrical and maintenance workers—but nearly 100 skilled technicians remain
on the street. |
 | A promise to train workers is a dead letter, as management bases its
call-backs on “ability to perform the work.” |
 | Health and safety is ignored as janitors remain laid off and restrooms,
locker rooms, and lunch rooms go uncleaned. |
Local 1299 President Marc Barragan announced that Great Lakes turned a
small profit in January—by “doing as much or more with fewer workers.” Many
workers on the job are working seven 12-hour shifts a week, or longer. “Every
day we read about an economic recovery with the exception of the unemployment
rate,” Barragan told the crowd. “US Steel and other companies are resuming
operations but without the numbers of workers.”
Added a machinist, “They’re making a profit because they’re working them to
death in there.”
Some workers brought their children to the march, which was accompanied by
continuous honking from passing motorists in the blue-collar town of River
Rouge. Fifteen-year-old Miranda Branstator, one of five children of laid-off
electrician Everett Branstator, took advantage of a snow day to “show everyone
how many people it affects.”
Twelve-year electrician Dave Erskine, now on his second unemployment
extension after 14 months off, said, “This is the first time I’ve had to stand
up for anything in my life.” Asked why US Steel—signatory to one of the oldest
labor contracts in the U.S.—thought it could get away with ignoring that
contract, Erskine said, “Because they’re ruthless and they have deep pockets.”
Arcelor-Mittal posts $1.07b Q4 profit as demand grows
TheSpec.com
- Business - Arcelor-Mittal posts
$1.07b Q4 profit as demand grows
Aoife White
The
Associated Press
BRUSSELS,
Belgium (Feb 11, 2010)
ArcelorMittal SA, the world's largest steel maker, posted a fourth quarter
profit of $1.07 billion yesterday and said it expects demand to strengthen this
year.
Steel buyers worldwide are set to increase purchases by 10 per cent this
year, said Aditya Mittal, the company's chief financial officer, as
manufacturers in developed and emerging markets use up excess stocks.
The parent of Hamilton's ArcelorMittal Dofasco has been hit hard by the
recent steel slump.
The profit in the last three months of 2009 was higher than a third- quarter
profit figure of $903 million and well above a $2.6-billion loss in 2008's
fourth quarter. Still, the company made a profit of just $118 million for all of
2009, compared to a $9.4-billion profit a year earlier.
ArcelorMittal says demand is already picking up -- with first quarter
shipments outpacing the fourth quarter -- but warned that this will be offset by
lower selling prices and higher costs for iron ore and coking coal. Net debt
will increase during the first quarter, it warned.
Mittal said the company would hike prices going forward but was still feeling
the pain of fulfilling orders made when prices were lower late last year.
He said ArcelorMittal will refocus from paying off debt to investing in its
business, seeking growth opportunities in India and Brazil. It has some $4
billion to spend on new projects this year.
Mittal said the company sees demand in developed countries -- the United
States, Germany and Japan -- growing 15 per cent from a very low level. Emerging
markets such as Brazil will also grow 15 per cent -- except for China, where
demand will grow at a steadier 5 per cent.
ArcelorMittal blamed lower selling prices and weak demand for the steel used
for cars, machinery and buildings for poor profits last year. Average prices
were down by more than a quarter.
ArcelorMittal produced some 6 per cent of world steel in 2009 -- down from
its usual 10 per cent.
This agreement isn't worth the cost
By Jim Stanford From Tuesday's Globe and Mail-Feb. 9, 2010
It's a clear case of déjà vu all over again. Back in the '80s, Brian
Mulroney raised the spectre of U.S. protectionism, then set out to win
guaranteed access for our exports. He didn't succeed: We got a "dispute panel"
system, instead, and even that doesn't work. But his government was publicly
committed to guaranteed access, so Mr. Mulroney put a brave face on his 1988
deal - spinning it as essential insurance and worth the steep price (control
over our energy).
The rest, of course, is history. From softwood to beef to steel, U.S. trade
policy (driven by the nitty-gritty of U.S. politics) has been as active and
arbitrary as ever. "Guaranteed access" was always a fiction. Now, instead of
learning from that experience, we're seeing a near-exact reprise with last
week's "agreement in principle" on government procurement.
The Harper government has been playing catch-up since the Buy American
controversy blew up a year ago. Stephen Harper's stated goal, as it was for
Mr. Mulroney in 1988, was to negotiate Canadian exemption from U.S. trade
laws.
The talks dragged on, and now most of the Recovery Act money has been
spent. But, as in 1988, the optics of coming home empty-handed were abhorrent.
So negotiators unveiled a "breakthrough" last week: Canadian companies get a
temporary right to bid on whatever contracts have not yet been finalized, but
only for seven of the specific programs funded by the Recovery Act.
Based on U.S. Trade Representative data, those remaining contracts might
total $4-billion to $5-billion worth of business, or half of 1 per cent of the
total $800-billion Recovery Act budget. And there's no guarantee Canadian
companies will win a dime of that business - especially since they're so late
to the game.
What's the cost of this one-time access to the Recovery Act's crumbs? Far
too high. Through the World Trade Organization system, Canada opens up access
to public purchasing in all provinces, and all cities with more than 50,000
inhabitants. Where the Buy American exemption is time-limited, Canada's offer
is mostly permanent. Our provincial and municipal procurement is worth tens of
billions of dollars every year - and this is the first time these immense
purchases will be subject to the provisions of international trade law. Worse
yet, we're doing this right when many struggling Canadian manufacturers - from
public transit to pharmaceuticals to windmills - could benefit mightily from
the strategic leveraging of a home-field advantage.
Perhaps the greatest irony is that the real macroeconomic impact of
President Barack Obama's Buy American preferences on our actual exports has
never been demonstrated. Canada's sales to Americans have been hammered, but
by the recession, not by protectionism. Most recent statistics (covering the
first 11 months of 2009) indicate that total Canadian exports to the United
States declined by 30 per cent from the same period in 2008.
Consumer industries (such as auto, where exports fell 32 per cent) led the
decline, as Americans endured their worst downturn since the 1930s. Curiously,
many industries that depend on public works spending (and hence should have
been most vulnerable to Buy American) actually experienced stronger
performance than industries where government purchasing is irrelevant. For
example, Canada's exports of cement and concrete, ventilation equipment,
turbine and power machinery, and even plastic pipe (the stuff rabid U.S.
protectionists were ripping out of the ground) all held up better last year
than our overall U.S. exports.
Our best hope, therefore, is to quickly get America back to work. Mr. Obama
is trying to do exactly that, with government-spending injections seven times
larger (proportionately) than Ottawa's. That's why the U.S. GDP grew three
times faster than ours over the last half of 2009. Only that gathering U.S.
recovery can resuscitate our exports, not another optics-driven trade deal.
Video clips of U.S. contractors ripping up Canadian pipe sparked righteous
indignation in Canada. But the impact of Buy American on our aggregate exports
has been statistically invisible; for individual companies genuinely harmed,
this deal won't make any difference. Yet, our politicians want to permanently
tie our hands governing a major additional chunk of our economy - just so they
can prove (like in 1988) they did something.
Doctors take an oath to "do no harm." But, in this case, the "cure" is
definitely worse than the disease.
Jim Stanford is an economist with the Canadian Auto Workers union.
February 8, 2010
'Buy American' deal good: N.B. business minister
By CBC News
Business New Brunswick Minister Victor Boudreau is welcoming Canada's
exemption from the protectionist "Buy American" policy that was attached to
the massive U.S. stimulus package.
Under the agreement announced on Friday, Canadian firms can bid on American
stimulus projects, and in return, the provinces agree to open their contracts
to bidding from U.S. contractors.
The province's business minister said he is not concerned about the
potential for New Brunswick companies losing out on work here in Canada.
"New Brunswick companies would be able to bid on contracts in Maine as well
for example. It's to create that better level field between our two countries
and the provinces and states," he said.
Boudreau said he learned of the agreement on a conference call early last
week with his federal and provincial counterparts.
The deal will let Canadian companies bid for the remaining $75-billion
worth of U.S. projects under the American stimulus program.
New Brunswick is dependent on open markets to the U.S. as 90 per cent of
its international exports head south of the border.
Members of Congress attached the "Buy American" clause to U.S. President
Barack Obama's $787-billion stimulus plan, which was passed last year.
The U.S. stimulus money is allocated for roads, public housing and other
infrastructure projects. Most of that funding has already been spent and the
program's deadline for handing out money is Feb. 17.
Lost business
Steve Ross, who operates a steel fabrication company in Halifax, said the
contentious rule cost him work in the United States.
"Yes, I would say there have been a number of projects that likely would
have been available for us to bid, and the opportunity to do, but with the
'Buy America' clause, we never had the opportunity," Ross said.
The agreement also lets companies bid across the border on municipal
contracts in larger cities, such as Fredericton, Moncton and Saint John.
All the provinces and territories had to agree to the deal before it could
go ahead.
The deal provides companies in both countries with permanent market access
to projects at the sub-federal level, meaning they can bid and work on public
works projects at the provincial, state or municipal
The agreement applies only to U.S. funding delivered under the current
stimulus program, not future legislation that might include similar "Buy
American" provisions.
Steel plant recalls laid off workers
By SCOT ALLYN-The Morning Journal
LORAIN — Laid-off workers at U.S. Steel's Lorain Tubular
Operation are being called back to work, according to Don Golden, president of
United Steelworkers Local 1104.
Meanwhile, the East 28th Street steel mill's other employer, Republic Engineered
Products, still has more than 500 workers laid off, Golden said.
Erin DiPietro, a spokeswoman for U.S. Steel, said she could not comment on
whether workers have been called back to their jobs.
But the company's fourth-quarter 2009 earnings statement said its tubular
operations returned to profitability in the last three months of the year.
Tubular shipments grew by 37 percent to 207 tons in the fourth quarter, the
statement said.
As of December, more than 400 Lorain U.S. Steel workers were laid off, according
to the office of U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, but that number has dwindled to about
50 now, Golden said.
"Business has been inching up, and we're expecting the last ones to be called
back by March," he said.
But hundreds of Lorain Republic Engineered Products workers have been idle for
more than a year, since the company shut down its blast furnace, according to
Golden.
They are still receiving unemployment benefits, and in November, they petitioned
for Trade Adjustment Assistance from the U.S. Bureau of Labor, according to Pat
Gallagher, subdistrict director for United Steelworkers District 1.
Trade Adjustment Assistance, a federal benefit, offers access to enhanced
training and unemployment benefits to workers who can show their livelihoods
have been harmed by foreign competition, Gallagher said.
The U.S. Department of Labor approved TAA benefits for Lorain Tubular Operation
workers in December.
Laid-off workers for Republic Engineered Products are still waiting to learn
whether their petition for TAA benefits will be approved, Gallagher said.
February 8, 2010
McGuinty defends decision to help Nortel workers
By Maria Babbage, The Canadian Press-Feb. 9, 2010
OTTAWA-It's up to voters to decide whether the Ontario Liberals are trying
to buy votes in an upcoming Ottawa byelection by providing an estimated $200
million to help Nortel pensioners or just doing the right thing, Premier
Dalton McGuinty said Monday.
"I have a tremendous amount of confidence in voters to draw whatever
conclusions they feel are fair and to make their decisions accordingly," he
said.
His government has an "obligation" to Nortel workers who put so many years
into the now insolvent company and are worried that they'll lose their
retirement income because its pension plan is underfunded, McGuinty added.
The move comes just a week after a March 4 byelection was called in the
riding of Ottawa West-Nepean - where many of the pensioners live - and just a
few days after the party's star candidate Bob Chiarelli urged the government
to help Nortel retirees.
Last week on the eve of a Toronto byelection, the government also promised
an estimated $15 million to keep a threatened hospital from closing in the
downtown riding. The Liberals ended up hanging onto the seat.
Opposition critics accused McGuinty of trying to buy another byelection on
the backs of seniors, but the premier brushed off suggestions that his timing
was suspicious.
"(The pensioners) have been asking us for an answer for a long time," said
McGuinty.
"Some have suggested that we should keep this a question mark until after
the byelection. I think that would be unfair. I think people are entitled to
know where we stand on this issue."
If McGuinty really wanted to help those pensioners "out of the goodness of
his heart," he would have done so eight months ago when they asked for help,
not when they're about to head to the polls, said Progressive Conservative
Lisa McLeod.
"He played the worst kind of politics with people's lives," she said.
"He strung seniors along for months who were worried about their future,
all so he could give Bob Chiarelli a nice media hit in the middle of an
election campaign. He put the 'buy' in byelection."
But the government would have been on the hook for a much larger amount of
money if it had jumped in to help Nortel pensioners a year ago, said Finance
Minister Dwight Duncan.
The valuation of Nortel's pension plan has changed "dramatically" over the
past year, he said.
"Quite a bit has changed, and we took this step as a result of a variety of
those factors," he said.
"We laid the groundwork for taking this step more than a year ago."
It's not yet clear how much the move will cost the province, which is
already grappling with an unprecedented $25-billion deficit this year alone.
But a loan of about $100 million to $200 million will likely be required,
Duncan said.
That will ensure that there's enough money available under the Pension
Benefits Guarantee Fund to help Nortel once it emerged from bankruptcy
protection, he said.
The fund provides Ontario's pensioners with up to $1,000 a month in the
event a pension plan fails to provide its full benefit, or any at all. It is
funded by corporate contributions, and the government has no legal obligation
to top it up.
In the past, the government has found ways to support the fund when it has
been insufficient to meet demand, including when farm equipment maker Massey
Ferguson and Algoma Steel filed for bankruptcy during previous recessions.
But the plan is dramatically underfunded and the province has injected
about $130 million since the spring to help cover some of the smaller claims.
Duncan said he expects that there will be others "in the queue," but none
have triggered a claim for benefits under the provincial fund.
Don Sproule, president of the Nortel Retirees and Former Employees
Protection Canada organization, said the move to bolster the provincial fund
will affect about 8,000 pensioners and 4,500 others.
"I wish we'd known this a lot earlier because it's a slow-motion train
wreck waiting to happen," he said.
There are about 17,500 ex-Nortel employees who are collecting pensions or
have a deferred plan, Sproule said.
Only those who worked in Ontario would be able to qualify for the
provincial guarantee plan, which is unique in Canada although others exist in
the United States and Britain.
Payouts that result from a windup of the pension plan would really only
benefit those pensioners earning $12,000 a year, Sproule said.
Nortel's pension plan is about 30 per cent underfunded, and the guarantee
fund doesn't contain enough money to cover the shortfall. If the guarantee
fund kicks in, workers would get up to $1,000 a month.
That means anyone earning more than $12,000 would only get 70 per cent of
their pension.
Many pensions are closer to $22,000 a year, so those people would see a big
drop in their monthly income.
Former Nortel employee Baraba Araelien
wipes her eye during a gathering in Oct. 7, 2009 at Queen's Park to
protest the loss of pensions.
MARK BLINCH/REUTERS FILE PHOTO
OTTAWA–The cash-strapped Liberal government promises to top up Nortel's
underfunded pension plan – a move affecting many retirees in an Ottawa
riding where a key by-election is being held March 4.
Opposition politicians say it's just another example of the government
trying to buy votes.
"This is the most callous, mean-spirited thing I've heard," said
Progressive Conservative MPP Lisa MacLeod (Nepean-Carleton).
While supportive of the pensioners, she said the government has known
about this problem for many months but only now has come up with the
funds, which could run into the millions.
"To do this in the by-election, it is simply disgusting. If they really
wanted to help Nortel pensioners they would have done it earlier," MacLeod
said.
However, Ontario Finance Minister Dwight Duncan calls that claim
"nonsense."
The Nortel campus is located in the riding of Ottawa-West Nepean,
formerly held by Liberal MPP Jim Watson. He abandoned his seat to run for
mayor of Ottawa. The Liberal candidate is former mayor of Ottawa, Bob
Chiarelli.
The Liberals' move during the by-election campaign is reminiscent of
what happened last week in the Toronto Centre by-election, where the
McGuinty government – already saddled with a $24.7 billion deficit – came
up with $15 million to save the Salvation Army Grace Hospital.
Duncan confirmed the province will pay into the Pension Benefits
Guarantee Fund so pensioners can get up to $1,000 per month.
Ontario is the only province with a pension guarantee fund. The
fund, which applies only to retirees who worked in Ontario, kicks in when
a pension plan fails to provide its full benefit, or any at all. It is
funded by corporate contributions and the government has no legal
obligation to top it up.
Telecom equipment giant Nortel filed for bankruptcy protection in
January 2009 after mounting losses and the prospects of continued red ink.
It has since been selling off its operations and there are now nearly
17,500 retired Nortel workers at risk of losing their pensions.
Don Sproule, president of The Nortel Retirees and Former Employees
Protection Canada organization, said he was still waiting for government
details but believes it involves winding up the plan – a move that could
aid those pensioners earning $12,000 a year but would do little for those
whose plan is on the higher end.
Nortel must pull out of creditor protection in order for the pensioner
payouts to happen.
"This is still a potential claim," Duncan told the Star. The
Liberals have gathered in Ottawa for a caucus retreat. "We've been setting
this up for a number of months now."
Duncan said he'll have more to say on the pension guarantee fund after
an actuarial study on it is completed this spring.
But Ontario NDP Leader Andrea Horwath says the government could have
helped the pensioners a lot earlier.
"The McGuinty Liberals have ignored the plight of Nortel pensioners for
months," Horwath said. "The thought of losing a seat has now forced them
to listen. Sadly, the only jobs they really care about are their own."
Last spring, Duncan brought changes in the budget that gave the
Liberals more flexibility in the pension fund so something like the Nortel
top-up could happen.
With files from The Canadian Press
A large 'Buy American' sign, in
support of Detroit's auto industry, is seen in the back
of an auto scrap yard in Detroit.
Photograph by: Rebecca Cook,
Reuters, Citizen Special
The Buy American breakthrough announced by the Harper
government yesterday is anything but. Canadian companies have
secured very little new access to U.S. public infrastructure
spending and at a large cost to public policy space for
Canadian provinces and cities. It is an ideological rather
than an economic coup for a government whose real goals are
weakening public services and reducing the role of government
across the country.
"Buy American" policies are entrenched in U.S. history,
dating back 75 years. President Barack Obama's most recent
conditions, which require that the steel and other materials
used in infrastructure projects funded by federal recovery
money be made in the United States, are only the latest
example of spending preferences that show up in highly popular
state and municipal procurement rules. They are a rational,
and from most accounts successful, economic development
strategy that Harper would have been wise to promote in Canada
if his goal truly was creating jobs and wealth.
Instead, we get a blindly ideological adherence to "open
markets" at all costs. Stephen Harper is trying to convince
Canadians that by including the provinces in the World Trade
Organization's government procurement agreement, as trade
minister Peter Van Loan announced yesterday, Canadian
suppliers will get sweeping new access to contracts to which
they were previously excluded by these Buy American
conditions. Nothing could be further from the truth.
A recent Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives report
explains that this will not get Canadian businesses access to
federally-funded mass transit or highway construction
projects, which the U.S. has exempted from its WTO
commitments. They cannot supply public utility services such
as telecommunications, nor will they have access to contracts
by the 13 states which have made no commitments at the WTO.
Even in the 37 states that have signed on, the report
states, Canadian suppliers will not be allowed to supply
construction-grade steel, vehicles, coal, or printing. And
municipal governments in the U.S. are exempt completely.
There is no way for Obama to force U.S. states or cities to
accept Canadian bids as equal to American bids even if the
U.S. president wanted to. Such a move would be fought tooth
and nail by U.S. Congress, which retains much more power than
the Canadian Parliament over trade deals. Harper, being much
more dictatorial, has instead negotiated a secret deal with
the provinces and once again excluded Canadians from the
debate. We should be outraged by this deal, not impressed.
Of course there's the glaring problem with Harper's
"breakthrough" -- that the $780 billion of U.S. stimulus cash
announced by Obama in 2008 will have all been allocated in the
next two weeks. We're scraping up crumbs here, and with big
consequences for democratic governance.
The provinces have been loath to sign the WTO's Government
Procurement Agreement and did not agree to include subnational
procurement in NAFTA because they could lose too much say in
how public money is spent without getting any new access to
the U.S. market.
So why have they agreed now? And what is Harper playing at
with this lopsided agreement?
We believe the Buy American controversy provided Harper and
the provinces, who are actively engaged in ambitious
free-trade talks with Europe, with an opportunity to
restructure the Canadian economy to reduce the role of our
communities in setting spending priorities. Subnational
procurement -- public spending by our local governments and
their utilities -- represents up to $200 billion in Canada.
Much of that goes toward services delivered publicly, such as
water and electricity. Ceding control over how our governments
spend public money makes it all the easier for companies to
push privatization.
This deal is not a breakthrough, just another assault on
democracy by the Harper government.
Maude Barlow is national chairwoman and Stuart Trew
is a trade campaigner with the Council of Canadians.
© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen
A large 'Buy American' sign,
in support of Detroit's auto industry, is seen in the
back of an auto scrap yard in Detroit.
Photograph by: Rebecca
Cook, Reuters, Citizen Special
February 5, 2010
'Buy American' deal exempts Canadian firms
By CBC News
Canadian companies will be exempt from a protectionist "Buy American"
clause in the U.S. government's $787-billion US economic stimulus package, the
federal government announced Friday.
The deal involves 37 U.S. states that adhere to the World Trade
Organization's government procurement agreement, effectively ending a dispute
that has raged since Congress passed the protectionist measures in 2009.
"Our government had serious concerns about the 'Buy American' provisions
contained in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act," International Trade
Minister Peter Van Loan told reporters in Ottawa.
"We believe that a co-ordinated approach to job creation and economic
recovery was essential for both countries," said Van Loan.
Speaking shortly after details of the deal were announced, Liberal trade
critic Scott Brison slammed it as "too little, too late" as much of the
stimulus funds made available by the Obama administration have already been
spent.
The U.S. stimulus money is allocated for roads, public housing and other
infrastructure projects, the drawback being that most of the funding has
already been spent. The program's deadline for handing out funding is Feb. 17.
"This deal is a pathetic attempt to try to create some level of symbolic
victory when, in fact, a real deal was required to defend Canadian interests,"
Brison told reporters in Ottawa. "There is absolutely no reason the government
couldn't have concluded this deal last March."
Access to sub-federal projects
The deal provides companies in both countries with permanent market access
to projects at the sub-federal level, meaning they can bid and work on public
works projects at the provincial, state or municipal level.
The agreement applies only to U.S. funding delivered under the current
stimulus program, not future legislation that might include similar "Buy
American" provisions.
International Trade Minister Peter Van Loan did not say how much the deal
would be worth to Canadian companies, calling any estimate "highly
speculative."
"We could only guess at how much value Canadians would have gotten out of
[the stimulus] contracts," said Van Loan. In the future, the deal will bring
"significant opportunities" for Canadians, he said.
'It sure is a sweet victory.'?Victor Fedeli, mayor
of North Bay, Ont.
The "Buy American" provision gives priority to U.S. iron, steel and other
manufactured goods for use in state-level and municipal public works and
building projects funded with stimulus tax revenue.
In October, reports of progress between the U.S and Canada over the
controversial provision prompted the Federation of Canadian Municipalities to
withdraw a resolution to block U.S. companies from bidding on city contracts
in this country.
'It's going to be good': mayor
The deal was made with the support of the provinces, territories and
industrial associations, said Van Loan.
But it also has the support of some municipal leaders.
"It sure is a sweet victory," said Victor Fedeli, the mayor of North Bay,
Ont.
"We have companies that make everything from sandbags and tarps to
municipal engineering to huge bridges that you find all over the United
States," said Fedeli. "And these companies now have their door open again."
Asked whether he worried the deal could also mean large American companies
winning contracts in North Bay that might otherwise have gone to his own
constituents, Fedeli said the city was "already a community with open doors."
"We bought two fire trucks in South Dakota for $850,000," he said. "They
had to compete against the Canadian firms, and while we certainly want to buy
Canadian, that is not the best value for taxpayers.
"The Canadian companies needed to sharpen their pencil, and if a company
can make a water reservoir in Illinois and ship it to North Bay and install it
for $1 million, I would hope someone in Ontario would have a sharper pencil,"
he said.
"I think it's going to be good."
U.S. Steel Avoids Severance
Date: Nov 2, 2009 11:28 AM
U. S. Steel workers bused to Hamilton, Posted By ASHLEY HOUSE, SUN MEDIA
U. S. Steel Canada has avoiding paying out severance packages by sending 70 laid
off steelworkers to temporarily work at its Hamilton plant.
Nelson Steel workers, who ran the pickling unit at the Nanticoke plant, will be
bused to Hamilton for the next 17 weeks on a temporary work recall starting
Wednesday.
The 70 workers are members of Local 8782, the steelworkers' amalgamated union
representing U. S. Steel Canada workers, but have a different contract than the
200 locked out employees and 800 laid off workers. The Nelson Steel workers'
contract expires in 2011.
When
operations at the Nanticoke plant shut down in March, 73
Nelson Steel employees were laid off.
"We're coming up to the 35-week mark that, under the Employment Standards Act,
triggers severance pay," said Rob Newstead, unit chair for the pickling line.
The workers' severance package includes one week of pay per year of service up
to 26 years and eight weeks for lack of notice pay. For most of Newstead's
members, it would have meant a $30,000 to $34,000 severance package.
The move is "good and bad," Newstead said.
Though U. S. Steel's motives are clear, Newstead said, the 17 weeks of work will
bring some relief to the laid off employees. The hours will be enough for
workers to open another employment insurance claim. It will also retrigger the
workers'
health
benefits.
"They were about to lose their benefits at the end of the month," Newstead said.
Workers in the pickling unit, which cleans coils, won't be working their usual
positions but have been hired on as general labourers.
Bill Ferguson, president of Local 8782, said the workers don't really have a
choice.
"There's not a lot they can do," Ferguson said. "They're running out of
employment insurance and they've got families."
The Hamilton facility fired up operations again in July and recalled all of its
workers, though the finishing operations are still down. The plant is producing
semi-finished steel slabs, which are worth less than finished steel.
The federal government has filed charges against U. S. Steel under the
Investment Canada Act.
Ferguson said all the semi-finished steel made here is being shipped back to the
U. S to be processed and sold back to Canada for a good price.
"All the steel for the
projects funded through the economic action plan, is being
shipped in from Gary, Indiana," Ferguson
said.
|